- §612
- CA law lets an electric utility condemn “any property necessary”
- Whole parcels
- Eminent domain can take a home outright — not just an easement
- $8.0M
- Just compensation one jury ordered SDG&E to pay in a Sunrise Powerlink land taking
What eminent domain means here
Eminent domain is the government's power to take private property for public use. California hands that power to electric utilities: under Public Utilities Code § 612, an electrical corporation “may condemn any property necessary for the construction and maintenance of its electric plant.” SDG&E — which took over this project as its builder and owner — would wield it. [1] [2]
That power is not limited to a thin strip. Eminent domain can take a full ownership interest in land — the parcel, and the house on it — when the utility deems it necessary. In practice it more often condemns a permanent right-of-way across part of a property and pays for the damage; but either way, the owner cannot simply say no. [1] [3]
There is a gate, and it is the place to stop this. Before SDG&E can condemn anything, the CPUC must grant it a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (required for any line at or above 200 kV). SDG&E is expected to apply later in 2026 — and only once that certificate issues does the condemnation door open. [4] [2]
What it would cost Temecula homeowners
A 500 kV line needs a wide right-of-way — on the order of 150 to 250 feet — cleared and kept clear across every parcel it crosses. Structures and uses inside that corridor have to go. [5]
California requires SDG&E to negotiate first and pay “just compensation” — fair market value, plus “severance damages” for the lost value to the rest of your property. But the owner's leverage is thin: a utility's finding that it needs your land is nearly impossible to overturn, and SDG&E can deposit its own estimate and take possession before a jury ever decides what the land was worth. [3]
It is not hypothetical. Building the Sunrise Powerlink, SDG&E condemned a 300-foot right-of-way across a San Diego County property; a jury rejected SDG&E's roughly $701,000 offer and awarded the owners about $8.0 million — most of it severance damage to the land left behind. [6] Independent research likewise finds transmission easements measurably depress property values. [7]
Sources
- [1]California Public Utilities Code § 612 (electrical corporation condemnation authority) — California Legislature (leginfo)
- [2]Golden Pacific Powerlink (IVNoS 500 kV) project status — SDG&E now builder/owner — SDG&E / CAISO / KPBS
- [3]California Eminent Domain Law, Code of Civil Procedure Title 7 (incl. § 1263.320 fair market value, § 1263.410 severance damages, § 1255 quick-take possession) — California Legislature (leginfo)
- [4]California Public Utilities Code § 1001 (Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity) — California Legislature (leginfo)
- [5]Transmission right-of-way width standards for 500 kV lines (~150–200 ft) — Tennessee Valley Authority (corroborated by U.S. NRC, ML17139D083)
- [6]San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Schmidt, No. D062671 (Cal. Ct. App., 4th Dist., Div. One, July 21, 2014) — Sunrise Powerlink condemnation; ~$8.0M verdict affirmed — California Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division One)
- [7]Transmission lines and residential property value (research review) — Headwaters Economics / EPRI "State of the Science"